<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phil Jackson Speaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/</link>
	<description>A Lakers Blog. Thoughts, reflections, and the odd rant on the Los Angeles Lakers and the NBA (even the Clippers).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drrayeye</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580795</link>
		<dc:creator>drrayeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580795</guid>
		<description>Brandon (26), for many reasons I agree with your perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon (26), for many reasons I agree with your perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580792</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580792</guid>
		<description>drrayeye said, &quot;From the posted comments to Phil’s media interview, it would appear that everyone was able to interpret them to fit their preexisting ideas.&quot;

You&#039;re probably right. But I watched Jackson&#039;s interview and if he is trying to motivate Lamar by insinuating he might come off the bench, he did an awfully good job of acting the part. 

I want to see Lamar come off the bench. But I don&#039;t look at it as a demotion. And if it happens, I hope Lamar doesn&#039;t look at it that way either.

I think it&#039;s in his, and the Lakers best interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drrayeye said, &#8220;From the posted comments to Phil’s media interview, it would appear that everyone was able to interpret them to fit their preexisting ideas.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably right. But I watched Jackson&#8217;s interview and if he is trying to motivate Lamar by insinuating he might come off the bench, he did an awfully good job of acting the part. </p>
<p>I want to see Lamar come off the bench. But I don&#8217;t look at it as a demotion. And if it happens, I hope Lamar doesn&#8217;t look at it that way either.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s in his, and the Lakers best interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580788</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580788</guid>
		<description>New post up: Know your enemy focused on the Rockets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New post up: Know your enemy focused on the Rockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drrayeye</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580786</link>
		<dc:creator>drrayeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580786</guid>
		<description>From the posted comments to Phil&#039;s media interview, it would appear that everyone was able to interpret them to fit their preexisting ideas.  Me too.

Let&#039;s start with the player development side.  The Lakers are committed to Andrew Bynum, and will probably develop him much like last year--gradually increasing his playing time from 24 to 36 minutes. 

The Lakers are almost as committed to Trevor Ariza, but maybe not for as many minutes.  Trevor and Andrew are the X factors this year.

Under these conditions, Lamar no longer has a clear starting position like before.  At first, it won&#039;t matter that much, since Bynum and Ariza will both start the season with fewer minutes than later on.  Lamar might even start at the 3 or the 4.  As the season ticks away, however, Lamar is likely to be one of the most unusual 6th men of all time.  Of course, there might be major injuries like last year, and Lamar could once again save the day.  He might once again be the guy who gets us back to the NBA championship.

But cap realities and expiring contracts might well send Lamar into a different life away from the Lakers before the season is over.  

As a loyal LA Lurker I&#039;ll keep a lookout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the posted comments to Phil&#8217;s media interview, it would appear that everyone was able to interpret them to fit their preexisting ideas.  Me too.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with the player development side.  The Lakers are committed to Andrew Bynum, and will probably develop him much like last year&#8211;gradually increasing his playing time from 24 to 36 minutes. </p>
<p>The Lakers are almost as committed to Trevor Ariza, but maybe not for as many minutes.  Trevor and Andrew are the X factors this year.</p>
<p>Under these conditions, Lamar no longer has a clear starting position like before.  At first, it won&#8217;t matter that much, since Bynum and Ariza will both start the season with fewer minutes than later on.  Lamar might even start at the 3 or the 4.  As the season ticks away, however, Lamar is likely to be one of the most unusual 6th men of all time.  Of course, there might be major injuries like last year, and Lamar could once again save the day.  He might once again be the guy who gets us back to the NBA championship.</p>
<p>But cap realities and expiring contracts might well send Lamar into a different life away from the Lakers before the season is over.  </p>
<p>As a loyal LA Lurker I&#8217;ll keep a lookout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonystarks</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580782</link>
		<dc:creator>tonystarks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580782</guid>
		<description>Well put. You canno&#039;t count out LO at the 3 spot - that lineup has to be given a chance at the very least. No need to get cute with the lineups when the starting 5 of Fish, Kobes, LO, Pau and Andrew has the potential to be DOMINANT.

I am referring to dominant both offensively and defensively. The one major thing that stands out about this lineup is the length. I said a couple months back that our length and height is going to cause a lot of deflections, blocks and havoc, especially with any penetration into the paint. Phil undoubtedly sees that potential:

&quot;But we’re going to have the potential for a very tall, lanky, strong front line and if they can learn to play defense together they’re going to be a very formidable opponent to score against.&quot;

Those are mighty words. Scary words for opposing teams cuz Phil wouldn&#039;t just toss out mere possibilities of defensive dominance to the media. Imagine Tony Parker trying to penetrate into a trio of trees with long arms. Or Chris Paul. The Lakers are just gonna have to practice their help D and rotations to the open shooters in the corner or the big man after the initial penetration. Easier said than done. 

If Odom (especially at the 3) earns Phil&#039;s trust on D, it&#039;s cuz he&#039;s closing out on the 3 point shooter. Same with Pau and Bynum and the opposing big in the paint (or in David West&#039;s case - that 15 footer Pau is going to have to close out on).

As has been said, this lineup has to be given a chance, at the very least. The ceiling of this lineup with all the talent involved (seriously - one of the top 2 players in the world with the league&#039;s premier front line on paper) is scary. I am not trying to promote hyperbole. It&#039;s a more than possible reality. 

Kurt is saying we&#039;re only gonna go as far as our D takes us. That D (the starting lineup w/ LO especially) has the potential to take us really, really far.

One more thing: basketball players aren&#039;t stupid. The Laker players realize how much talent this team has. I am fully expecting a different level of intensity on defense from the get-go (a la Boston last year) . These players realize how close they were last year and aren&#039;t gonna take health and time for granted. It&#039;s part of the &quot;mental toughness&quot; we keep hearing about. I fully expect to see players diving on the court for loose balls and such - all the hustle plays and a renewed sense of vigor from GAME 1 of the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put. You canno&#8217;t count out LO at the 3 spot &#8211; that lineup has to be given a chance at the very least. No need to get cute with the lineups when the starting 5 of Fish, Kobes, LO, Pau and Andrew has the potential to be DOMINANT.</p>
<p>I am referring to dominant both offensively and defensively. The one major thing that stands out about this lineup is the length. I said a couple months back that our length and height is going to cause a lot of deflections, blocks and havoc, especially with any penetration into the paint. Phil undoubtedly sees that potential:</p>
<p>&#8220;But we’re going to have the potential for a very tall, lanky, strong front line and if they can learn to play defense together they’re going to be a very formidable opponent to score against.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those are mighty words. Scary words for opposing teams cuz Phil wouldn&#8217;t just toss out mere possibilities of defensive dominance to the media. Imagine Tony Parker trying to penetrate into a trio of trees with long arms. Or Chris Paul. The Lakers are just gonna have to practice their help D and rotations to the open shooters in the corner or the big man after the initial penetration. Easier said than done. </p>
<p>If Odom (especially at the 3) earns Phil&#8217;s trust on D, it&#8217;s cuz he&#8217;s closing out on the 3 point shooter. Same with Pau and Bynum and the opposing big in the paint (or in David West&#8217;s case &#8211; that 15 footer Pau is going to have to close out on).</p>
<p>As has been said, this lineup has to be given a chance, at the very least. The ceiling of this lineup with all the talent involved (seriously &#8211; one of the top 2 players in the world with the league&#8217;s premier front line on paper) is scary. I am not trying to promote hyperbole. It&#8217;s a more than possible reality. </p>
<p>Kurt is saying we&#8217;re only gonna go as far as our D takes us. That D (the starting lineup w/ LO especially) has the potential to take us really, really far.</p>
<p>One more thing: basketball players aren&#8217;t stupid. The Laker players realize how much talent this team has. I am fully expecting a different level of intensity on defense from the get-go (a la Boston last year) . These players realize how close they were last year and aren&#8217;t gonna take health and time for granted. It&#8217;s part of the &#8220;mental toughness&#8221; we keep hearing about. I fully expect to see players diving on the court for loose balls and such &#8211; all the hustle plays and a renewed sense of vigor from GAME 1 of the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580781</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580781</guid>
		<description>Awesome - training camp is just around the corner. Seems like a short summer...but I guess it always seems that way when your team makes it to the finals and there&#039;s a great Olympics tourny in the middle. 

All I want to say about the LO/Pau/Andrew line-up is that I hope Phil gives them enough time to try the group out before making changes. Certainly, if we aren&#039;t winning and that group seems to be the core of the problem, we should mix things up. But otherwise, I hope he is patient enough to wait until at least a month into the season before benching LO. 

I think we all know he isn&#039;t a perfect player, but he is very versatile. He does too many things well to hide him on the bench. Combine that with his fragile ego, I&#039;m concerned about what making him come off the bench might lead to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome &#8211; training camp is just around the corner. Seems like a short summer&#8230;but I guess it always seems that way when your team makes it to the finals and there&#8217;s a great Olympics tourny in the middle. </p>
<p>All I want to say about the LO/Pau/Andrew line-up is that I hope Phil gives them enough time to try the group out before making changes. Certainly, if we aren&#8217;t winning and that group seems to be the core of the problem, we should mix things up. But otherwise, I hope he is patient enough to wait until at least a month into the season before benching LO. </p>
<p>I think we all know he isn&#8217;t a perfect player, but he is very versatile. He does too many things well to hide him on the bench. Combine that with his fragile ego, I&#8217;m concerned about what making him come off the bench might lead to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris h</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580779</link>
		<dc:creator>chris h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580779</guid>
		<description>hey Kurt
in regards to the FB&amp;G format...
could you put the name, time, date of the commentor at the top of the comment?
I often find myself scrolling down to see who posted it, then I better understand the tone, etc of the comment.
ie; if it were from John R, then I&#039;d probably read it differently then say if it were from Darius, or drrayeye...etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Kurt<br />
in regards to the FB&amp;G format&#8230;<br />
could you put the name, time, date of the commentor at the top of the comment?<br />
I often find myself scrolling down to see who posted it, then I better understand the tone, etc of the comment.<br />
ie; if it were from John R, then I&#8217;d probably read it differently then say if it were from Darius, or drrayeye&#8230;etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chearn</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580778</link>
		<dc:creator>chearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580778</guid>
		<description>Odom as the 6th man is intriguing, but instead of thinking of him as Ginobili we should be thinking of him more in the vein of a Kevin McHale 6th man.  Odom and McHale&#039;s skill set are very different, however Odom is more like a McHale 6th man than he is a Ginobili 6th man.  As a 6th man Odom should be more willing to play with his back to the basket.  After all he would have more players to kick the ball to for a three Vujacic, Farmar, Radmonivich and Walton.

I too believe that Odom deserves the chance to see what a starting five of Kobe, Bynum, Odom, Gasol and Fisher can do.  In a contract year Odom will probably need numbers and he can achieve that easier as the 6th man.

PJ is blessed with multiple possibilities as he said in his news conference , it will depend upon the match ups as to who will get extended minutes and the team as a whole must be pliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odom as the 6th man is intriguing, but instead of thinking of him as Ginobili we should be thinking of him more in the vein of a Kevin McHale 6th man.  Odom and McHale&#8217;s skill set are very different, however Odom is more like a McHale 6th man than he is a Ginobili 6th man.  As a 6th man Odom should be more willing to play with his back to the basket.  After all he would have more players to kick the ball to for a three Vujacic, Farmar, Radmonivich and Walton.</p>
<p>I too believe that Odom deserves the chance to see what a starting five of Kobe, Bynum, Odom, Gasol and Fisher can do.  In a contract year Odom will probably need numbers and he can achieve that easier as the 6th man.</p>
<p>PJ is blessed with multiple possibilities as he said in his news conference , it will depend upon the match ups as to who will get extended minutes and the team as a whole must be pliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jodial</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580777</link>
		<dc:creator>jodial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580777</guid>
		<description>I too would like to see Lamar get a chance at starting, but I think it&#039;s really almost a matter of semantics - he is still going to get his minutes.

One advantage of having him come off the bench that I haven&#039;t seen anyone mention yet is that it cushions against his getting into early foul trouble - I can remember a lot of games when Lamar would pick up two or three cheap fouls early and it would affect the rest of his game (as well as the team&#039;s rotations). Having him enter the game 8 or 10 minutes in with a full 6 fouls to use might help him to play more freely, which is when he&#039;s at his best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too would like to see Lamar get a chance at starting, but I think it&#8217;s really almost a matter of semantics &#8211; he is still going to get his minutes.</p>
<p>One advantage of having him come off the bench that I haven&#8217;t seen anyone mention yet is that it cushions against his getting into early foul trouble &#8211; I can remember a lot of games when Lamar would pick up two or three cheap fouls early and it would affect the rest of his game (as well as the team&#8217;s rotations). Having him enter the game 8 or 10 minutes in with a full 6 fouls to use might help him to play more freely, which is when he&#8217;s at his best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exhelodrvr</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/09/27/phil-jackson-speaks/comment-page-1/#comment-580776</link>
		<dc:creator>exhelodrvr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1338#comment-580776</guid>
		<description>Kurt,
I don&#039;t think we are &quot;dumping on Odom&quot; as a starter. His versatility, rebounding, and size would be very beneficial off the bench, at least until Mihm, Powell, Walton, and Vlad show something. 

It&#039;s an effort to picture the best overall rotation for the team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt,<br />
I don&#8217;t think we are &#8220;dumping on Odom&#8221; as a starter. His versatility, rebounding, and size would be very beneficial off the bench, at least until Mihm, Powell, Walton, and Vlad show something. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an effort to picture the best overall rotation for the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

