<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lakers Season Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/</link>
	<description>A Lakers Blog. Thoughts, reflections, and the odd rant on the Los Angeles Lakers and the NBA (even the Clippers).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-2/#comment-582073</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582073</guid>
		<description>Game preview up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game preview up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-2/#comment-582072</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582072</guid>
		<description>I look at the Rockets and can see two different trains of thought.  The first echoes what Reed said.  They&#039;re an unknown enigma and we&#039;ll need to see them play before any qualitative judgements can be made on them or their chances.  The second, though, tells me that they are the same team that won all those games last year and they&#039;ve added a pretty good player.  Sure that player has been disruptive in the past, but he&#039;s still a pretty good player who can really help them (and who, honestly, I don&#039;t see hurting them too much.  I mean, if he goes all crazy on them Adleman can just sit him down and suspend him or whatever).  So, while I think everyone should be cautious about labeling them favorites, I definitely think they should be in the discussion of top teams just because, (big caveat) if healthy, they have a really strong team:  Alston, T-Mac, Battier, Scola, Yao, Landry, Barry, Brooks, Hayes...plus wildcards like (a washed up) Francis, rookie muscle in Joey Dorsey, and Von Wafer (who played pretty well in the pre-season).  You add a motivated Artest to that scrappy, tough bunch, and honestly I&#039;m worried before I&#039;ve seen them play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look at the Rockets and can see two different trains of thought.  The first echoes what Reed said.  They&#8217;re an unknown enigma and we&#8217;ll need to see them play before any qualitative judgements can be made on them or their chances.  The second, though, tells me that they are the same team that won all those games last year and they&#8217;ve added a pretty good player.  Sure that player has been disruptive in the past, but he&#8217;s still a pretty good player who can really help them (and who, honestly, I don&#8217;t see hurting them too much.  I mean, if he goes all crazy on them Adleman can just sit him down and suspend him or whatever).  So, while I think everyone should be cautious about labeling them favorites, I definitely think they should be in the discussion of top teams just because, (big caveat) if healthy, they have a really strong team:  Alston, T-Mac, Battier, Scola, Yao, Landry, Barry, Brooks, Hayes&#8230;plus wildcards like (a washed up) Francis, rookie muscle in Joey Dorsey, and Von Wafer (who played pretty well in the pre-season).  You add a motivated Artest to that scrappy, tough bunch, and honestly I&#8217;m worried before I&#8217;ve seen them play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wondahbap</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-582071</link>
		<dc:creator>wondahbap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582071</guid>
		<description>Reed,  

Ariza would help also.  I keep forgetting about him.  We might see him over Sasha at the end of close games for defensive reasons.  

Chandler is good.  i know that, but I think Bynum and/or Pau is better, and IF Chandler were able to neutralize one, we still have the other.  Advantage us.  When we played NOH with a healthy Bynum, we killed them.  When we played them with Pau, we killed them.  Specifically because of the center position.  We&#039;ll now have both (let&#039;s pray), nevermind the fact that, they have no one who can match up with Lamar. 

NOH is an awesome team.  I just think the Lakers are a very bad matchup for them.

Snoopy2006,

Pau is better than you think on defense.  West is physical player on offense, which helps, but Pau length provides problems.  Though, when I mentioned West, I said it with Lamar in mind covering him,  but also agree with Reed.  Pau did a decent job against BETTER power forwards.  All time great PF&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed,  </p>
<p>Ariza would help also.  I keep forgetting about him.  We might see him over Sasha at the end of close games for defensive reasons.  </p>
<p>Chandler is good.  i know that, but I think Bynum and/or Pau is better, and IF Chandler were able to neutralize one, we still have the other.  Advantage us.  When we played NOH with a healthy Bynum, we killed them.  When we played them with Pau, we killed them.  Specifically because of the center position.  We&#8217;ll now have both (let&#8217;s pray), nevermind the fact that, they have no one who can match up with Lamar. </p>
<p>NOH is an awesome team.  I just think the Lakers are a very bad matchup for them.</p>
<p>Snoopy2006,</p>
<p>Pau is better than you think on defense.  West is physical player on offense, which helps, but Pau length provides problems.  Though, when I mentioned West, I said it with Lamar in mind covering him,  but also agree with Reed.  Pau did a decent job against BETTER power forwards.  All time great PF&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-582070</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582070</guid>
		<description>I think West is much, much better defensively than Boozer. He has several inches on him and is quicker. On the flip side, I think Pau (in addition to Odom, as noted) could guard West fairly well. Pau did a solid job defensively on Boozer, Duncan, and KG, using his length and smarts to force them into difficult shots. Chandler is an elite defensive center -- one of the very best. His length, quickness, and athleticism would give Pau and Bynum more trouble than almost anyone else. I agree about putting Kobe on Paul though. Or maybe Ariza.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think West is much, much better defensively than Boozer. He has several inches on him and is quicker. On the flip side, I think Pau (in addition to Odom, as noted) could guard West fairly well. Pau did a solid job defensively on Boozer, Duncan, and KG, using his length and smarts to force them into difficult shots. Chandler is an elite defensive center &#8212; one of the very best. His length, quickness, and athleticism would give Pau and Bynum more trouble than almost anyone else. I agree about putting Kobe on Paul though. Or maybe Ariza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoopy2006</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-582069</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoopy2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582069</guid>
		<description>46 - I see it the other way around. Boozer is slow, he could not get around Pau to score, and had trouble with his length. West is essentially a tall, strong SF, somewhat in the mold of Odom, but with a killer midrange game and possibly even a quicker first step. He is a nightmare offensively. There is no way Pau can stick with his drives to the hoop, and if he gives West too much space, that 15-foot jumper is a 50%+ shot. 

We DO have a player who can guard West - but he might start the game on the bench for us. Odom is the perfect player to match up with West, with his length, speed, and strength virtually mirroring West&#039;s. We actually would have matched up (defensively) better with NO last year, with Odom at the 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>46 &#8211; I see it the other way around. Boozer is slow, he could not get around Pau to score, and had trouble with his length. West is essentially a tall, strong SF, somewhat in the mold of Odom, but with a killer midrange game and possibly even a quicker first step. He is a nightmare offensively. There is no way Pau can stick with his drives to the hoop, and if he gives West too much space, that 15-foot jumper is a 50%+ shot. </p>
<p>We DO have a player who can guard West &#8211; but he might start the game on the bench for us. Odom is the perfect player to match up with West, with his length, speed, and strength virtually mirroring West&#8217;s. We actually would have matched up (defensively) better with NO last year, with Odom at the 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.D. Hastings</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-582068</link>
		<dc:creator>J.D. Hastings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582068</guid>
		<description>The reason the Spurs don&#039;t scare me -yet- is because they have the feeling of the Lakers circa 2003 to me, having crested over the hill and slowly letting their reserve players dry up.  With Manu out, Duncan has to dominate from early on and that could lead to him being worn down by the time we see them in the playoffs.  Everybody has to take up the slack until Manu comes back.  So while they don&#039;t make me feel comfortable, I just feel like their old legs will be vulnerable come may.

I agree with Reed about Houston.  Their undefined variables outweigh their known quantities.  

Utah doesn&#039;t scare me because when we faced them last year they were completely healthy and we weren&#039;t.  And we beat them.  It&#039;s up to them to show how much they can improve before I fear them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the Spurs don&#8217;t scare me -yet- is because they have the feeling of the Lakers circa 2003 to me, having crested over the hill and slowly letting their reserve players dry up.  With Manu out, Duncan has to dominate from early on and that could lead to him being worn down by the time we see them in the playoffs.  Everybody has to take up the slack until Manu comes back.  So while they don&#8217;t make me feel comfortable, I just feel like their old legs will be vulnerable come may.</p>
<p>I agree with Reed about Houston.  Their undefined variables outweigh their known quantities.  </p>
<p>Utah doesn&#8217;t scare me because when we faced them last year they were completely healthy and we weren&#8217;t.  And we beat them.  It&#8217;s up to them to show how much they can improve before I fear them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wondahbap</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-582067</link>
		<dc:creator>wondahbap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582067</guid>
		<description>Reed,

David West would have the same problems Boozer had with us.  He think he would be neutralized.  I just don&#039;t see NOH&#039;s bigs matching up with ours.  Chandler will get outclassed by Pau and/or Bynum, and who else do they have?  Melvin Ely?  Posey will help them, but Posey will not have the KG and Perk backing him up.  Offensively, CP3 would make us look good, but I expect the Lakers to be much improved, and this year, I expect to see kobe playing Paul, and Sasha playing the other guard.  That will make a huge difference this year.  NO is good.  But not like us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed,</p>
<p>David West would have the same problems Boozer had with us.  He think he would be neutralized.  I just don&#8217;t see NOH&#8217;s bigs matching up with ours.  Chandler will get outclassed by Pau and/or Bynum, and who else do they have?  Melvin Ely?  Posey will help them, but Posey will not have the KG and Perk backing him up.  Offensively, CP3 would make us look good, but I expect the Lakers to be much improved, and this year, I expect to see kobe playing Paul, and Sasha playing the other guard.  That will make a huge difference this year.  NO is good.  But not like us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wondahbap</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-582066</link>
		<dc:creator>wondahbap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582066</guid>
		<description>Utah doesn&#039;t scare me.  D-Will is their only advantage.  He&#039;s not enough.  They need 7 games in Utah with the refs letting them hang all over our guys in order to beat the Lakers.  New Orleans will get absolutely killed by our bigs again.  The team that has the &quot;potential&quot; to be scary is Houston.  I&#039;m not sold on them yet, because I  don&#039;t believe that they&#039;ll be healthy all season.  I don&#039;t believe Yao or T-Mac have Championship level stones, and I don&#039;t beileve Artest will be the missing piece.  BUT this is the team that if those things go right have the potential to play great D.  They&#039;ll have two elite and versatile defenders in Battier and Artest, and a 7&#039;6 guy backing them up, and hard nosed players like Landry and Scola.  They could be great defensively.

I&#039;m really not concerned with any other team.  None of them got better than the Lakers got, and the Lakers walked through the West Playoffs last year.  It&#039;s Houston or no one.  And that&#039;s a big &quot;if&quot; with the Rockets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utah doesn&#8217;t scare me.  D-Will is their only advantage.  He&#8217;s not enough.  They need 7 games in Utah with the refs letting them hang all over our guys in order to beat the Lakers.  New Orleans will get absolutely killed by our bigs again.  The team that has the &#8220;potential&#8221; to be scary is Houston.  I&#8217;m not sold on them yet, because I  don&#8217;t believe that they&#8217;ll be healthy all season.  I don&#8217;t believe Yao or T-Mac have Championship level stones, and I don&#8217;t beileve Artest will be the missing piece.  BUT this is the team that if those things go right have the potential to play great D.  They&#8217;ll have two elite and versatile defenders in Battier and Artest, and a 7&#8217;6 guy backing them up, and hard nosed players like Landry and Scola.  They could be great defensively.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really not concerned with any other team.  None of them got better than the Lakers got, and the Lakers walked through the West Playoffs last year.  It&#8217;s Houston or no one.  And that&#8217;s a big &#8220;if&#8221; with the Rockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZERB</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-582065</link>
		<dc:creator>ZERB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582065</guid>
		<description>tick tock tick tock

who is going to win tonight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tick tock tick tock</p>
<p>who is going to win tonight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2008/10/27/lakers-season-preview-2/comment-page-1/#comment-582064</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1373#comment-582064</guid>
		<description>I do not see Utah as a significant threat. They are very, very good, and might be the second best team in the West, but I think we are a nightmare matchup for them. The Gasol-Odom combination was too long for Okur-Boozer, shutting down Boozer (their top scorer) and scoring at will. Boozer is simply too small and slow to guard either Gasol or Odom. Add in Bynum, and Utah will be overpowered down low. Bynum also counteracts Utah&#039;s biggest advantage in last year&#039;s series -- rebounding. They also lack a single perimeter defender that has any chance of slowing Kobe (or at least making him work for hard perimeter shots like Bowen, Battier, Artest, Pierce, etc.). I know Deron is a big problem and made Farmar an instant -10 disaster in every game, but he does not counteract all of the other massive advantages we have against them. 

I worry about San Antonio and New Orleans. Both teams have the size to somewhat neutralize our twin bigs. If Gasol and Bynum aren&#039;t scoring efficiently (55+% shooting) our offense could slow down and evolve into Kobe ball. Both teams have bigs that could put ours in foul trouble (Duncan, West), although neither teams have the depth up front that we do (with Odom). Both teams have elite wing defenders that can make Kobe work (Posey, Bowen). Both have speedy point guards that we have absolutely no answer for (Paul, Parker). Both have shooters to punish us when their PGs get into the lane (Peja, Peterson, Posey, Ginobili, Finley, Bowen). Both are well coached. San Antonio also has Manu, one of the elite clutch &quot;closers.&quot; Our big advantage over both teams lies in our bench, as neither SA nor NO is particularly deep. 

I think Utah matches up very well with both SA and NO, so it may be a game of rock-paper-scissors, with Utah wanting to avoid us, and us wanting to avoid NO/SA. Although, the truth is that if healthy we will have a small advantage over any of these teams. 

I have no idea what to make of Houston until I see them play several times. They are a complete enigma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not see Utah as a significant threat. They are very, very good, and might be the second best team in the West, but I think we are a nightmare matchup for them. The Gasol-Odom combination was too long for Okur-Boozer, shutting down Boozer (their top scorer) and scoring at will. Boozer is simply too small and slow to guard either Gasol or Odom. Add in Bynum, and Utah will be overpowered down low. Bynum also counteracts Utah&#8217;s biggest advantage in last year&#8217;s series &#8212; rebounding. They also lack a single perimeter defender that has any chance of slowing Kobe (or at least making him work for hard perimeter shots like Bowen, Battier, Artest, Pierce, etc.). I know Deron is a big problem and made Farmar an instant -10 disaster in every game, but he does not counteract all of the other massive advantages we have against them. </p>
<p>I worry about San Antonio and New Orleans. Both teams have the size to somewhat neutralize our twin bigs. If Gasol and Bynum aren&#8217;t scoring efficiently (55+% shooting) our offense could slow down and evolve into Kobe ball. Both teams have bigs that could put ours in foul trouble (Duncan, West), although neither teams have the depth up front that we do (with Odom). Both teams have elite wing defenders that can make Kobe work (Posey, Bowen). Both have speedy point guards that we have absolutely no answer for (Paul, Parker). Both have shooters to punish us when their PGs get into the lane (Peja, Peterson, Posey, Ginobili, Finley, Bowen). Both are well coached. San Antonio also has Manu, one of the elite clutch &#8220;closers.&#8221; Our big advantage over both teams lies in our bench, as neither SA nor NO is particularly deep. </p>
<p>I think Utah matches up very well with both SA and NO, so it may be a game of rock-paper-scissors, with Utah wanting to avoid us, and us wanting to avoid NO/SA. Although, the truth is that if healthy we will have a small advantage over any of these teams. </p>
<p>I have no idea what to make of Houston until I see them play several times. They are a complete enigma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

