<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lakers/Magic: When The Magic Have The Ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/</link>
	<description>A Lakers Blog. Thoughts, reflections, and the odd rant on the Los Angeles Lakers and the NBA (even the Clippers).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drrayeye</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616714</link>
		<dc:creator>drrayeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616714</guid>
		<description>Coming into this series, the Lakers have earned a slight edge, mostly tied to home court advantage.  Should Orlando win game one, that advantage reverses.

The focus of the entire series and the NBA championship for the Lakers must be on game one.  Should we make it to game one in our thinking, we must further focus down to the first quarter of game 1--and the Lakers need to be ahead.

Orlando tends to start a game with emphasis on the inside game, mixing in more and more three point shooting as the game goes on.  They are surging forward the most by the fourth quarter.  They can come back down 20 points--as we&#039;ve seen against the Cavs.  

When the Lakers fail to score, Orlando has opportunities for unguarded 3 point plays and Howard may be able to beat his defender down court and set up deep.  This can build on itself, and Orlando can score in cycles.  

When Orlando fails to score, especially from 3 point attempts, they are vulnerable to scoring bursts against them.  

Scoring runs are to be expected both ways.  The Lakers obviously need to find ways to minimize such runs by scoring themselves.  Executing the triangle and not falling into the three point shot mentality is critical for the Lakers. 

Winning this first game is key.  We really don&#039;t need to talk about anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming into this series, the Lakers have earned a slight edge, mostly tied to home court advantage.  Should Orlando win game one, that advantage reverses.</p>
<p>The focus of the entire series and the NBA championship for the Lakers must be on game one.  Should we make it to game one in our thinking, we must further focus down to the first quarter of game 1&#8211;and the Lakers need to be ahead.</p>
<p>Orlando tends to start a game with emphasis on the inside game, mixing in more and more three point shooting as the game goes on.  They are surging forward the most by the fourth quarter.  They can come back down 20 points&#8211;as we&#8217;ve seen against the Cavs.  </p>
<p>When the Lakers fail to score, Orlando has opportunities for unguarded 3 point plays and Howard may be able to beat his defender down court and set up deep.  This can build on itself, and Orlando can score in cycles.  </p>
<p>When Orlando fails to score, especially from 3 point attempts, they are vulnerable to scoring bursts against them.  </p>
<p>Scoring runs are to be expected both ways.  The Lakers obviously need to find ways to minimize such runs by scoring themselves.  Executing the triangle and not falling into the three point shot mentality is critical for the Lakers. </p>
<p>Winning this first game is key.  We really don&#8217;t need to talk about anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616705</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616705</guid>
		<description>new post up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new post up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luubi</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616704</link>
		<dc:creator>luubi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616704</guid>
		<description>so it&#039;s going to be Breen, JVG, and Jackson time and time again? feh.  Can we bring back Dick Stockton and Hubie Brown for that 80s feeling?

I kind of miss Walton and Jones.  They&#039;re entertaining in their hyperbolic/deflating way (&quot;_____ is absolutely magnificient, what can _____ do?  what CAN they do?&quot;  Bill, they&#039;re up by 5!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so it&#8217;s going to be Breen, JVG, and Jackson time and time again? feh.  Can we bring back Dick Stockton and Hubie Brown for that 80s feeling?</p>
<p>I kind of miss Walton and Jones.  They&#8217;re entertaining in their hyperbolic/deflating way (&#8220;_____ is absolutely magnificient, what can _____ do?  what CAN they do?&#8221;  Bill, they&#8217;re up by 5!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616702</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616702</guid>
		<description>FreeDarko does point out some of Breen&#039;s annoying tendencies. As Darius says, he&#039;s way too &#039;vanilla&#039; and is afraid to say anything remotely controversial. He&#039;s also prone to spouting clichés and harping on technicalities. With that being said, he is a very good announcer who rarely makes factual mistakes (unlike say, Kevin Harlan) and he does try to add some excitement to the game in his own way. I don&#039;t have a problem with him.

Burke has a tendency to be overly verbose (similar to Doug Collins), but her commentary is miles more insightful than many of the guys who normally occupy the booth. She&#039;s probably the only sideline reporter who doesn&#039;t make me cringe during those annoying end-of-quarter interviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FreeDarko does point out some of Breen&#8217;s annoying tendencies. As Darius says, he&#8217;s way too &#8216;vanilla&#8217; and is afraid to say anything remotely controversial. He&#8217;s also prone to spouting clichés and harping on technicalities. With that being said, he is a very good announcer who rarely makes factual mistakes (unlike say, Kevin Harlan) and he does try to add some excitement to the game in his own way. I don&#8217;t have a problem with him.</p>
<p>Burke has a tendency to be overly verbose (similar to Doug Collins), but her commentary is miles more insightful than many of the guys who normally occupy the booth. She&#8217;s probably the only sideline reporter who doesn&#8217;t make me cringe during those annoying end-of-quarter interviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boris</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616701</link>
		<dc:creator>boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616701</guid>
		<description>I also thought the FD takedown of Breen was a little OTT as well - he&#039;s not great at all and occasionally terrible, but he is certainly adequate and is a clear foil to JVG.I just don&#039;t understand what Jackson&#039;s doing in that unit, he speaks before thinking and won&#039;t back down when he gets it wrong but goes for the coverup.

Any game that Hubie calls is a game I&#039;ll watch - he&#039;s the best color in the game. I enjoyed Doris on color as well most of the few games I saw her - unfortunately it looks like most of the audience aren&#039;t really up for a woman analyst. She is by far the best sideline reporter of course, but I think she&#039;s sold a bit short there. Though I think the fact that Phil gives fairly straight answers to her questions shows that she has respect.

Great analysis from Kwame and Darius in the OP. My feeling is that most of the Laker nation are overrating Drew&#039;s ability to guard Howard and underrating his offense which has picked up substantially. I like the idea of staying home on the shooters but it may not be possible all the time. And both Kobe and LO can be ill disciplined on the defensive end. I think the key factor is Howard&#039;s mind set - he is still young and often makes poor decisions when he gets the ball in the post. The lakers could force some issues here if he gets some pressure on a late double after he has started his dribble. I am also OK to live or die with Alston shooting jump shots. Maybe Fish can sneak in to draw some charges on Howard&#039;s roll to the hoop sometimes? DH&#039;s body control could be a key factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also thought the FD takedown of Breen was a little OTT as well &#8211; he&#8217;s not great at all and occasionally terrible, but he is certainly adequate and is a clear foil to JVG.I just don&#8217;t understand what Jackson&#8217;s doing in that unit, he speaks before thinking and won&#8217;t back down when he gets it wrong but goes for the coverup.</p>
<p>Any game that Hubie calls is a game I&#8217;ll watch &#8211; he&#8217;s the best color in the game. I enjoyed Doris on color as well most of the few games I saw her &#8211; unfortunately it looks like most of the audience aren&#8217;t really up for a woman analyst. She is by far the best sideline reporter of course, but I think she&#8217;s sold a bit short there. Though I think the fact that Phil gives fairly straight answers to her questions shows that she has respect.</p>
<p>Great analysis from Kwame and Darius in the OP. My feeling is that most of the Laker nation are overrating Drew&#8217;s ability to guard Howard and underrating his offense which has picked up substantially. I like the idea of staying home on the shooters but it may not be possible all the time. And both Kobe and LO can be ill disciplined on the defensive end. I think the key factor is Howard&#8217;s mind set &#8211; he is still young and often makes poor decisions when he gets the ball in the post. The lakers could force some issues here if he gets some pressure on a late double after he has started his dribble. I am also OK to live or die with Alston shooting jump shots. Maybe Fish can sneak in to draw some charges on Howard&#8217;s roll to the hoop sometimes? DH&#8217;s body control could be a key factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yusuf</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616700</link>
		<dc:creator>Yusuf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616700</guid>
		<description>Lil pau - IMO the regular season 0-2 record means little in this series because of the big changes.

- Nelsons health (He was a huge reason the Magic won those games)
- No Shannon
- No Farmar

And this is all at the pg position.
Not to mention the lakers were slumping going into the 2nd game of a back to back.

This has been said many times but I believe to be true. The lakers have won all their &quot;must-win&quot; games. They didnt respect the magic the way they did cleveland and boston but they wont overlook them now. That being said the magic do give the lakers legitimate mismatch problems but I dont think they can exploit them well enough to win 4 games</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lil pau &#8211; IMO the regular season 0-2 record means little in this series because of the big changes.</p>
<p>- Nelsons health (He was a huge reason the Magic won those games)<br />
- No Shannon<br />
- No Farmar</p>
<p>And this is all at the pg position.<br />
Not to mention the lakers were slumping going into the 2nd game of a back to back.</p>
<p>This has been said many times but I believe to be true. The lakers have won all their &#8220;must-win&#8221; games. They didnt respect the magic the way they did cleveland and boston but they wont overlook them now. That being said the magic do give the lakers legitimate mismatch problems but I dont think they can exploit them well enough to win 4 games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616699</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616699</guid>
		<description>Good luck tonight fellas! I&#039;m hoping Magic in 5(sweep is not a possibility) as I&#039;ve got tickets to Games 3, 4 and 5:)

I just hope both teams show up as if they do, this will be a terrific series!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck tonight fellas! I&#8217;m hoping Magic in 5(sweep is not a possibility) as I&#8217;ve got tickets to Games 3, 4 and 5:)</p>
<p>I just hope both teams show up as if they do, this will be a terrific series!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlizzardOfOz</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616698</link>
		<dc:creator>BlizzardOfOz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616698</guid>
		<description>Also, &quot;bang!&quot; is not only lame but a transparent ripoff of &quot;yes!&quot;.  My first choice would be Marv or even Kevin Calabro, but I&#039;m not sure who they would pair with them (can&#039;t have Reggie doing the finals after all).  You have to admit Breen&#039;s blandness makes a pretty good foil to JVG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, &#8220;bang!&#8221; is not only lame but a transparent ripoff of &#8220;yes!&#8221;.  My first choice would be Marv or even Kevin Calabro, but I&#8217;m not sure who they would pair with them (can&#8217;t have Reggie doing the finals after all).  You have to admit Breen&#8217;s blandness makes a pretty good foil to JVG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lil' pau</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616697</link>
		<dc:creator>lil' pau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616697</guid>
		<description>56: Amen, brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>56: Amen, brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lil' pau</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/06/03/lakersmagic-when-the-magic-have-the-ball/comment-page-2/#comment-616696</link>
		<dc:creator>lil' pau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=1635#comment-616696</guid>
		<description>A pessimistic stat:  11 out of 11 times this postseason, the team that had a winning record against their opponent in the regular season went on to win the playoff round as well.  (There were 3 playoff contests featuring teams that tied in the regular season).

The Lakers have broken big streaks all season-- this would be a nice one for them to break as well... 

(That said, other than the possible absence of Nelson and the emergence of Ariza and Brown, I&#039;m grasping for reasons why the Lakers are fundamentally better than they were the first time around...  I must add that it&#039;s hard for me to forget last year&#039;s horror when we were manhandled by Bos in the regular season, then were heavy favorites in the playoffs, only to....)

18 1/2 hours to go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pessimistic stat:  11 out of 11 times this postseason, the team that had a winning record against their opponent in the regular season went on to win the playoff round as well.  (There were 3 playoff contests featuring teams that tied in the regular season).</p>
<p>The Lakers have broken big streaks all season&#8211; this would be a nice one for them to break as well&#8230; </p>
<p>(That said, other than the possible absence of Nelson and the emergence of Ariza and Brown, I&#8217;m grasping for reasons why the Lakers are fundamentally better than they were the first time around&#8230;  I must add that it&#8217;s hard for me to forget last year&#8217;s horror when we were manhandled by Bos in the regular season, then were heavy favorites in the playoffs, only to&#8230;.)</p>
<p>18 1/2 hours to go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

