<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maturity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/</link>
	<description>A Lakers Blog. Thoughts, reflections, and the odd rant on the Los Angeles Lakers and the NBA (even the Clippers).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sT</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637857</link>
		<dc:creator>sT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637857</guid>
		<description>Finally getting around to the game and FB&amp;G after my Astronomy class, to see the real Stars tonight.  You want to know something Mimsy?  You just seem to have really cool things to say about things...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally getting around to the game and FB&amp;G after my Astronomy class, to see the real Stars tonight.  You want to know something Mimsy?  You just seem to have really cool things to say about things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mimsy</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637759</guid>
		<description>Also, I finally had a chance to watch the Artest-Kimmel interview, and the man is  &lt;i&gt;hilarious!&lt;/i&gt;  He is well on his way to become my new favorite Laker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I finally had a chance to watch the Artest-Kimmel interview, and the man is  <i>hilarious!</i>  He is well on his way to become my new favorite Laker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637753</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637753</guid>
		<description>Game preview finally up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game preview finally up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mimsy</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637750</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637750</guid>
		<description>With regards to Ron Artest... not only have these people not been actually watching the games and seen him play rather than merely watching numbers, they apparently didn&#039;t read ESPN&#039;s daily dime early in the season either, where Ron was quoted as saying he doesn&#039;t care what his numbers are because his job on the Lakers is not to be the primary scorer. He suggested judging his performance based on how the opponents he is guarding are doing instead... how well &lt;i&gt;they&lt;/i&gt; shoot and score.

Another point on him, before I go make dinner: Yes, it&#039;s great that Ron can do a talk show interviews in his underwear without being crucified, but it&#039;s nearly as important that he&#039;s not being celebrated for his antics either.

As Kurt pointed out, a guy walking around in Hollywood in just his underwear is called Tuesday, and it&#039;s not a big deal. When you&#039;re a bit different (and let&#039;s not mince words, with Artest that&#039;s a bit of an understatement) having everyone around you constantly gush over how great it is that you&#039;re so comfortable with being different, and how much they support you being able to be yourself, can be just as bad as the crucifixion would be.

But when you can go home from work and relax completely and just be you... without anyone around you making a huge deal out it in any way... then all of a sudden, all those frustrating things at work that used to drive you crazy, that you never could let go of, that eventually piled up until the pressure was too great and everything exploded, all those little things just don&#039;t seem that bad anymore. Because when you get home, you are finally able to just relax and be yourself, and forget all about that work stress.

I am now going to make dinner. Wearing sweats and fluffy slippers. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to Ron Artest&#8230; not only have these people not been actually watching the games and seen him play rather than merely watching numbers, they apparently didn&#8217;t read ESPN&#8217;s daily dime early in the season either, where Ron was quoted as saying he doesn&#8217;t care what his numbers are because his job on the Lakers is not to be the primary scorer. He suggested judging his performance based on how the opponents he is guarding are doing instead&#8230; how well <i>they</i> shoot and score.</p>
<p>Another point on him, before I go make dinner: Yes, it&#8217;s great that Ron can do a talk show interviews in his underwear without being crucified, but it&#8217;s nearly as important that he&#8217;s not being celebrated for his antics either.</p>
<p>As Kurt pointed out, a guy walking around in Hollywood in just his underwear is called Tuesday, and it&#8217;s not a big deal. When you&#8217;re a bit different (and let&#8217;s not mince words, with Artest that&#8217;s a bit of an understatement) having everyone around you constantly gush over how great it is that you&#8217;re so comfortable with being different, and how much they support you being able to be yourself, can be just as bad as the crucifixion would be.</p>
<p>But when you can go home from work and relax completely and just be you&#8230; without anyone around you making a huge deal out it in any way&#8230; then all of a sudden, all those frustrating things at work that used to drive you crazy, that you never could let go of, that eventually piled up until the pressure was too great and everything exploded, all those little things just don&#8217;t seem that bad anymore. Because when you get home, you are finally able to just relax and be yourself, and forget all about that work stress.</p>
<p>I am now going to make dinner. Wearing sweats and fluffy slippers. <img src='http://www.forumblueandgold.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exhelodrvr</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637749</link>
		<dc:creator>exhelodrvr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637749</guid>
		<description>Does Hollinger&#039;s strength of schedule adjust for the stronger teams not having to play themselves? (i.e. the Net&#039;s playing the Lakers is extremely high &quot;strength of schedule&quot;, while the Lakers playing the Nets is extremely low, even though it&#039;s the same game.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Hollinger&#8217;s strength of schedule adjust for the stronger teams not having to play themselves? (i.e. the Net&#8217;s playing the Lakers is extremely high &#8220;strength of schedule&#8221;, while the Lakers playing the Nets is extremely low, even though it&#8217;s the same game.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.d. Hastings</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637748</link>
		<dc:creator>j.d. Hastings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637748</guid>
		<description>Some interesting things I noticed in Hollinger&#039;s rankings, specifically the strength of sched stats.  

Before the Lakers played the Nets, they had a pretty tough ranking.  Something like .524, despite having played easy teams recently.   NJN singlehandedly dropped them to .496, which is right in the middle of the league.  Add it to their home-away numbers and they&#039;ve had an easy go of it so far.  

Okay, but other teams on the extreme, where you might expect to see some shifting in perception as the schedules regress to the mean.  The easiest records so far this season (with win %):

1- Denver: .401
2- Bucks: .412
3- Portland: .420
4- Sacramento: .443
5- Cleveland: .450
6- Indiana: .451 
7-Boston: .453
8- Clippers: .455
9- Phoenix: .457
10- Orlando: .466

Okay, now hardest scheds:
1- New Orleans: .605
2- Houston: .595
3- Toronto: .587
4- Chicago: .582
5- Oklahoma: .578
6-Detroit: 577
7- Minnesota: .545
8- Atlanta: .534
9- Golden State: .528

Anyways, you get the picture.  What I don&#039;t know is: Will these all gradually revert closer to .500?  Is this more or less important than home-away numbers (which you usually hear more about)?  

If so, then I think we can look at those with the easiest records as being overrated right now, while those with the toughest records being underrated.  

Speaks well for what Houston and Okalhoma are doing, while predicting brighter days ahead for the Hornets (whose schedule will only be rated harder after tonight).  Meanwhile, Denver and Portland may not be as good as they&#039;ve seen and the good starts for the Bucks and Kings could be illusory.  

I&#039;m interested to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting things I noticed in Hollinger&#8217;s rankings, specifically the strength of sched stats.  </p>
<p>Before the Lakers played the Nets, they had a pretty tough ranking.  Something like .524, despite having played easy teams recently.   NJN singlehandedly dropped them to .496, which is right in the middle of the league.  Add it to their home-away numbers and they&#8217;ve had an easy go of it so far.  </p>
<p>Okay, but other teams on the extreme, where you might expect to see some shifting in perception as the schedules regress to the mean.  The easiest records so far this season (with win %):</p>
<p>1- Denver: .401<br />
2- Bucks: .412<br />
3- Portland: .420<br />
4- Sacramento: .443<br />
5- Cleveland: .450<br />
6- Indiana: .451<br />
7-Boston: .453<br />
8- Clippers: .455<br />
9- Phoenix: .457<br />
10- Orlando: .466</p>
<p>Okay, now hardest scheds:<br />
1- New Orleans: .605<br />
2- Houston: .595<br />
3- Toronto: .587<br />
4- Chicago: .582<br />
5- Oklahoma: .578<br />
6-Detroit: 577<br />
7- Minnesota: .545<br />
8- Atlanta: .534<br />
9- Golden State: .528</p>
<p>Anyways, you get the picture.  What I don&#8217;t know is: Will these all gradually revert closer to .500?  Is this more or less important than home-away numbers (which you usually hear more about)?  </p>
<p>If so, then I think we can look at those with the easiest records as being overrated right now, while those with the toughest records being underrated.  </p>
<p>Speaks well for what Houston and Okalhoma are doing, while predicting brighter days ahead for the Hornets (whose schedule will only be rated harder after tonight).  Meanwhile, Denver and Portland may not be as good as they&#8217;ve seen and the good starts for the Bucks and Kings could be illusory.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637746</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637746</guid>
		<description>Also, Artest wasn&#039;t wearing Boxers on Kimmel- as he pointed out, they were shorts. Draw-string and all. He had a pair of boxers on underneath and in a kind of brilliant PR move, he used them to explain the whole infamous &quot;houston team bus&quot; incident from last year. 

I gained even more appreciation of Artest after watching that Kimmel stint. And I think he&#039;s a huuuuge upgrade on Ariza. I just hope he doesn&#039;t let the nitpicking bother him.  We don&#039;t need him to score 17 ppg. We need him to lock down guys and be an enforcer and nail those corner 3&#039;s...but he also has shown that he&#039;s a great passer, which is a huge bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Artest wasn&#8217;t wearing Boxers on Kimmel- as he pointed out, they were shorts. Draw-string and all. He had a pair of boxers on underneath and in a kind of brilliant PR move, he used them to explain the whole infamous &#8220;houston team bus&#8221; incident from last year. </p>
<p>I gained even more appreciation of Artest after watching that Kimmel stint. And I think he&#8217;s a huuuuge upgrade on Ariza. I just hope he doesn&#8217;t let the nitpicking bother him.  We don&#8217;t need him to score 17 ppg. We need him to lock down guys and be an enforcer and nail those corner 3&#8242;s&#8230;but he also has shown that he&#8217;s a great passer, which is a huge bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637741</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637741</guid>
		<description>Drew,

Check out the last post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew,</p>
<p>Check out the last post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637740</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637740</guid>
		<description>(40) Follow up
Q. Here is the exacty question and answer from the chat:
Based upon what you have seen so far with Ron Artest come playoff time will the Ariza/Artest trade benefit the Lakers. Assuming they play either the Celtics or Cavs. in the finals. 

Sheridan:
Based on what I&#039;ve seen so far? He&#039;ll be a tremendous asset in the finals, should they get there. He&#039;s going to be an even bigger distraction sometime in the meantime -- especially if he keeps playing as poorly as he has been and his frustration boils over -- and his going on Jimmy Kimmel in boxers will look tame by comparison. I&#039;m with Hollinger on this one and believe the Rockets got the better end of this deal. If I&#039;m wrong, we&#039;ll see why in the finals.

Unbelieveable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(40) Follow up<br />
Q. Here is the exacty question and answer from the chat:<br />
Based upon what you have seen so far with Ron Artest come playoff time will the Ariza/Artest trade benefit the Lakers. Assuming they play either the Celtics or Cavs. in the finals. </p>
<p>Sheridan:<br />
Based on what I&#8217;ve seen so far? He&#8217;ll be a tremendous asset in the finals, should they get there. He&#8217;s going to be an even bigger distraction sometime in the meantime &#8212; especially if he keeps playing as poorly as he has been and his frustration boils over &#8212; and his going on Jimmy Kimmel in boxers will look tame by comparison. I&#8217;m with Hollinger on this one and believe the Rockets got the better end of this deal. If I&#8217;m wrong, we&#8217;ll see why in the finals.</p>
<p>Unbelieveable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2009/12/01/maturity/comment-page-1/#comment-637738</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2174#comment-637738</guid>
		<description>Game preview coming soon. Day job kicking my ass today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game preview coming soon. Day job kicking my ass today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

