<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Love Him, We Love Him Not&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/</link>
	<description>A Lakers Blog. Thoughts, reflections, and the odd rant on the Los Angeles Lakers and the NBA (even the Clippers).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PauGasoline70</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-3/#comment-650761</link>
		<dc:creator>PauGasoline70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650761</guid>
		<description>Remember, he is still a young cat. He didnt choose to spend some time at the NCAA level (which would have done him good) and has had to develop his game throughout these last three years(as a kid in a big mans body, no less). Needless to say, the Kids got a substantial way to go. Its not a knock on his current game because his fundementals are there, but more than anything he just has to continue to put the work in (which I am sure that he&#039;s doing)...I think in the end, Bynum will workout and many of us that have had our doubts will be all the happier for the team not giving up on him. It just takes time to come into our own...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, he is still a young cat. He didnt choose to spend some time at the NCAA level (which would have done him good) and has had to develop his game throughout these last three years(as a kid in a big mans body, no less). Needless to say, the Kids got a substantial way to go. Its not a knock on his current game because his fundementals are there, but more than anything he just has to continue to put the work in (which I am sure that he&#8217;s doing)&#8230;I think in the end, Bynum will workout and many of us that have had our doubts will be all the happier for the team not giving up on him. It just takes time to come into our own&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avidfan</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-3/#comment-650746</link>
		<dc:creator>Avidfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650746</guid>
		<description>I think people get carried away with Bynum. It´s human nature to  daydream about future glories while ignoring that your best years are NOW. 

Bynum tomorrow, might be great. His low effort level does not bode too well, but who knows. 

Bynum, now, is not, I repeat is not on a level with Gasol and/or Odom. 

There will be the occasional game where he outplays them. But for each of this games, there´s five where he´s outplayed. 

Christ, if Bynum had gone 20pp +, 19 rebouds, 5 blocks, 4 assist + for two consecutive games, while leading the team against two elite teams (Jazz were scorching hot before last night), people would be going BERSERK in the forums claiming him to be the next Shaq. 

But the one who did it is old &quot;finesse-soft-whitey-nonmuscular&quot; Gasol, half the forum ans writers downplay it or grudginly acknowledge that it was &quot;good&quot;. It is the present, and the present is never exciting... gimme some uncertain future.

Lets be realistic, lets enjoy what we have. When Kobe and Gasol fade into the sunset, we will go through rebuilding an probably will struggle even get to the playoffs with Bynum (remember the bulls post-Jordan... or our beloved lakers post Kobe and pre-Gasol). 

And we all will reminisce the olden times... that we didn´t enjoy at the time because we took Kobe AND Gasol for granted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people get carried away with Bynum. It´s human nature to  daydream about future glories while ignoring that your best years are NOW. </p>
<p>Bynum tomorrow, might be great. His low effort level does not bode too well, but who knows. </p>
<p>Bynum, now, is not, I repeat is not on a level with Gasol and/or Odom. </p>
<p>There will be the occasional game where he outplays them. But for each of this games, there´s five where he´s outplayed. </p>
<p>Christ, if Bynum had gone 20pp +, 19 rebouds, 5 blocks, 4 assist + for two consecutive games, while leading the team against two elite teams (Jazz were scorching hot before last night), people would be going BERSERK in the forums claiming him to be the next Shaq. </p>
<p>But the one who did it is old &#8220;finesse-soft-whitey-nonmuscular&#8221; Gasol, half the forum ans writers downplay it or grudginly acknowledge that it was &#8220;good&#8221;. It is the present, and the present is never exciting&#8230; gimme some uncertain future.</p>
<p>Lets be realistic, lets enjoy what we have. When Kobe and Gasol fade into the sunset, we will go through rebuilding an probably will struggle even get to the playoffs with Bynum (remember the bulls post-Jordan&#8230; or our beloved lakers post Kobe and pre-Gasol). </p>
<p>And we all will reminisce the olden times&#8230; that we didn´t enjoy at the time because we took Kobe AND Gasol for granted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Younger78</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-2/#comment-650521</link>
		<dc:creator>Younger78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650521</guid>
		<description>This article and these comments are too easy on Bynum. 

The Lakers gave him his max contract so the expectation of Bynum need to adjust. He isn&#039;t a rookie anymore. There is no excuse for him not being a beast on the boards. It sickens me when I see him letting shrimps box him out or when he tries to box others out using his arms. I also get frustrated with him being late on rotations and picking up stupid fouls. Where is his energy? Look at what Noah has been doing and even Dejuan Blair.

Shoot, Dejuan Blair is like Rudy and Bynum is like O&#039;hara (Vince Vaughn&#039;s character). I can just imagine Bynum&#039;s career being similar to O&#039;hara&#039;s:

&quot;You just summed up your entire sorry career here in one sentence! If you had a tenth of the heart of Ruettiger, you&#039;d have made All-American by now! As it is, you just went from third team to the prep team! Get out of here!&quot;

All I want from Bynum is energy and some smart defense. That&#039;s the maturity and initiative that he lacks. We haven&#039;t seen it yet and my prediction is that we probably won&#039;t ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article and these comments are too easy on Bynum. </p>
<p>The Lakers gave him his max contract so the expectation of Bynum need to adjust. He isn&#8217;t a rookie anymore. There is no excuse for him not being a beast on the boards. It sickens me when I see him letting shrimps box him out or when he tries to box others out using his arms. I also get frustrated with him being late on rotations and picking up stupid fouls. Where is his energy? Look at what Noah has been doing and even Dejuan Blair.</p>
<p>Shoot, Dejuan Blair is like Rudy and Bynum is like O&#8217;hara (Vince Vaughn&#8217;s character). I can just imagine Bynum&#8217;s career being similar to O&#8217;hara&#8217;s:</p>
<p>&#8220;You just summed up your entire sorry career here in one sentence! If you had a tenth of the heart of Ruettiger, you&#8217;d have made All-American by now! As it is, you just went from third team to the prep team! Get out of here!&#8221;</p>
<p>All I want from Bynum is energy and some smart defense. That&#8217;s the maturity and initiative that he lacks. We haven&#8217;t seen it yet and my prediction is that we probably won&#8217;t ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zephid</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-2/#comment-650491</link>
		<dc:creator>Zephid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650491</guid>
		<description>92, I would suggest trading Kobe.  For one of either Lebron James or Kevin Durant.

That&#039;s it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>92, I would suggest trading Kobe.  For one of either Lebron James or Kevin Durant.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darius</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-2/#comment-650482</link>
		<dc:creator>Darius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650482</guid>
		<description>New Post up with some morning links to help in the waiting for the game tonight.

http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/10/fast-break-thoughts-morning-links/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Post up with some morning links to help in the waiting for the game tonight.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/10/fast-break-thoughts-morning-links/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/10/fast-break-thoughts-morning-links/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-2/#comment-650480</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650480</guid>
		<description>@91
&quot;We also remember that Kobe hasn’t won without an uber talented big man.&quot;
He also never had an uber talented perimeter man, and it usually takes two uber talented people to win it all.
I like the idea of putting Bynum with the second unit a lot on paper but there is the issue on how well bynum would take not starting. Also, Odom doesn&#039;t attack the rim as much when kobe is around, becoming a lot more perimeter oriented unfortunately.

@92
It&#039;s safe to say everyone likes a 20-10 legit center with 2bpg. The problem is that if the 20 isn&#039;t happening, Bynum&#039;s energy, effort or whatever you want to call it, isn&#039;t there. His focus also gets a shot when the 20 isn&#039;t happening, leading to a few dumb fouls which coupled with official bias leads to the bench. What is implicit in not needing Bynum, I think or always thought it was, is trading him for someone more consistent. It&#039;s a bit alarming when you have no idea what 2 of your top 6 players are bringing in a game in a night-in night-out basis

@95
Andrew Bynum, C 22 3-8 0-0 3-4 3 6 9 0 0 1 0 4 +9 9 
Andrew Bynum, C 16 2-5 0-0 1-1 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 5 0 5 
Andrew Bynum, C 23 2-6 0-0 0-1 2 2 4 1 1 0 1 2 -3 4 
Andrew Bynum, C 16 2-3 0-0 2-2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 5 +8 6 
Andrew Bynum, C 17 3-11 0-0 0-1 4 1 5 0 1 0 1 5 -6 6 
unless you were counting hack-a-Howard as a solid contribution, those stats back exactly what I remember. A player looking for his shot first, a bit rusty(which is totally forgivable since bouncing back from a knee injury is no easy feat), foul-prone thanks to lack of focus+ a few unfair freebies for Howard and didn&#039;t look for rebounds enough
I totally agree with the second part though, in that this year we will need him to bring his A game against most other contenders. Just not sure what exactly was there to underestimate in last year&#039;s Finals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@91<br />
&#8220;We also remember that Kobe hasn’t won without an uber talented big man.&#8221;<br />
He also never had an uber talented perimeter man, and it usually takes two uber talented people to win it all.<br />
I like the idea of putting Bynum with the second unit a lot on paper but there is the issue on how well bynum would take not starting. Also, Odom doesn&#8217;t attack the rim as much when kobe is around, becoming a lot more perimeter oriented unfortunately.</p>
<p>@92<br />
It&#8217;s safe to say everyone likes a 20-10 legit center with 2bpg. The problem is that if the 20 isn&#8217;t happening, Bynum&#8217;s energy, effort or whatever you want to call it, isn&#8217;t there. His focus also gets a shot when the 20 isn&#8217;t happening, leading to a few dumb fouls which coupled with official bias leads to the bench. What is implicit in not needing Bynum, I think or always thought it was, is trading him for someone more consistent. It&#8217;s a bit alarming when you have no idea what 2 of your top 6 players are bringing in a game in a night-in night-out basis</p>
<p>@95<br />
Andrew Bynum, C 22 3-8 0-0 3-4 3 6 9 0 0 1 0 4 +9 9<br />
Andrew Bynum, C 16 2-5 0-0 1-1 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 5 0 5<br />
Andrew Bynum, C 23 2-6 0-0 0-1 2 2 4 1 1 0 1 2 -3 4<br />
Andrew Bynum, C 16 2-3 0-0 2-2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 5 +8 6<br />
Andrew Bynum, C 17 3-11 0-0 0-1 4 1 5 0 1 0 1 5 -6 6<br />
unless you were counting hack-a-Howard as a solid contribution, those stats back exactly what I remember. A player looking for his shot first, a bit rusty(which is totally forgivable since bouncing back from a knee injury is no easy feat), foul-prone thanks to lack of focus+ a few unfair freebies for Howard and didn&#8217;t look for rebounds enough<br />
I totally agree with the second part though, in that this year we will need him to bring his A game against most other contenders. Just not sure what exactly was there to underestimate in last year&#8217;s Finals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wondahbap</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-2/#comment-650479</link>
		<dc:creator>wondahbap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650479</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t read all 94 comments ahead of mine, so, excuse me if this has been said already....

Although the offense is more fluid with Lamar and Pau together, Bynum&#039;s importance is greatest against the teams that matter:  Denver, Cleveland, Orlando, and Boston.  

His size and skill is something that none of those teams, outside of the Cavaliers, can match.  Against all of these teams, his defense (when he&#039;s playing it well) will be vital.  Especially against Dwight &amp; Orlando, and LeBron &amp; Cleveland.  Our ceiling on defense is much higher when Bynum is out there, engaged and wanting to play D.

So, what do we prefer?  Even if our offense isn&#039;t the same with Bynum, it&#039;s still not bad.  It can still get better with him and Pau together.  But it&#039;s defense that will make us repeat.  We don&#039;t need to score 108 ppg like last year, if we hold teams to 95-96 ppg.  

it&#039;s about the teams that matter, and how Bynum fills that role.  Not the result of 1 1/2 games in February with him out.  It&#039;s not going to be easy this year.  If anyone thinks we won it last year with minimal production form Bynum is underestimating what he did in the Finals, and what the other contenders can do this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t read all 94 comments ahead of mine, so, excuse me if this has been said already&#8230;.</p>
<p>Although the offense is more fluid with Lamar and Pau together, Bynum&#8217;s importance is greatest against the teams that matter:  Denver, Cleveland, Orlando, and Boston.  </p>
<p>His size and skill is something that none of those teams, outside of the Cavaliers, can match.  Against all of these teams, his defense (when he&#8217;s playing it well) will be vital.  Especially against Dwight &amp; Orlando, and LeBron &amp; Cleveland.  Our ceiling on defense is much higher when Bynum is out there, engaged and wanting to play D.</p>
<p>So, what do we prefer?  Even if our offense isn&#8217;t the same with Bynum, it&#8217;s still not bad.  It can still get better with him and Pau together.  But it&#8217;s defense that will make us repeat.  We don&#8217;t need to score 108 ppg like last year, if we hold teams to 95-96 ppg.  </p>
<p>it&#8217;s about the teams that matter, and how Bynum fills that role.  Not the result of 1 1/2 games in February with him out.  It&#8217;s not going to be easy this year.  If anyone thinks we won it last year with minimal production form Bynum is underestimating what he did in the Finals, and what the other contenders can do this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig W.</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-2/#comment-650478</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650478</guid>
		<description>Kaveh,
Wilt&#039;s 76er team was considered one of the best &#039;teams&#039; of the &#039;60s and had very respected players at each position. The Laker team had West and Goodrich and Hariston was a terrific rebounder also. Therefore, even Wilt - the player most likely to do it all himself - had to have good teammates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaveh,<br />
Wilt&#8217;s 76er team was considered one of the best &#8216;teams&#8217; of the &#8217;60s and had very respected players at each position. The Laker team had West and Goodrich and Hariston was a terrific rebounder also. Therefore, even Wilt &#8211; the player most likely to do it all himself &#8211; had to have good teammates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-2/#comment-650475</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650475</guid>
		<description>Kaveh,
Completely agree with the post.  I guess the only question I have is if Bynum will consistently be healthy or not.  That does not mean you necessarily trade him but he has yet to prove he can play a majority of a season.  I also think this does make him gun shy at times worrying about his knee holding up.  You really see what he can do when he gets ticked off and is not thinking about it but at other times he still looks tentative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaveh,<br />
Completely agree with the post.  I guess the only question I have is if Bynum will consistently be healthy or not.  That does not mean you necessarily trade him but he has yet to prove he can play a majority of a season.  I also think this does make him gun shy at times worrying about his knee holding up.  You really see what he can do when he gets ticked off and is not thinking about it but at other times he still looks tentative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Wee Lim</title>
		<link>http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2010/02/09/we-love-him-we-love-him-not/comment-page-2/#comment-650466</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Wee Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumblueandgold.com/?p=2762#comment-650466</guid>
		<description>Kaveh, if you did catch a glimpse of my proposal at the start of the day, you would know what I am advocating in all of this. To say that this team can win without Kobe is plain and simple stupid. And when I say win I mean going all the way.

First off, Phil would not think twice on retiring if Kobe is not on board. These guys we have, Ron, Pau, Lamar these guys are good. Pau Gasol is VERY good. But to say these guys don&#039;t need Kobe is out of the question. 

If you have caught my drift from the last 2 paragraphs, I never mentioned Bynum in there. If anyone here does not like a 20-10 legit center with 2 bpg please raise your hand and I&#039;ll have Gilbert Arenas shoot you with a machine gun.

The point is not about liking Bynum or not. I can guarantee you, 28 other teams would have Bynum start for their teams RIGHT NOW. I say that with a great deal of respect to the league&#039;s only legitimate center in Yao Ming because he is injured, and the league&#039;s best center in Dwight Howard.

Andrew Bynum on a good day gives you 20-10. On his worst days he gives you solid contributions via his blocking and rebounding. If he is unleashed, without conflict or having to worry about someone else in the post getting touches, he COULD be 25-12-3 easily. After all, he was 22-11-2 for us playing beside Kobe (and without Pau).

The problem about your post is that you are referring to the stereotype of &quot;we don&#039;t need Kobe and Bynum to win&quot; which in fact is not the case of this post. If anything, Darius came up with this post because of 2 things:

a. The Lakers won beautifully last night without the top 2 characters...

b. The Lakers are shelling out effort whenever 2 of the best players are absent.

So try to look through the post as more than just we don&#039;t need Kobe... although you could really make a case that more than half of the fanbase is clamoring we don&#039;t need Bynum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaveh, if you did catch a glimpse of my proposal at the start of the day, you would know what I am advocating in all of this. To say that this team can win without Kobe is plain and simple stupid. And when I say win I mean going all the way.</p>
<p>First off, Phil would not think twice on retiring if Kobe is not on board. These guys we have, Ron, Pau, Lamar these guys are good. Pau Gasol is VERY good. But to say these guys don&#8217;t need Kobe is out of the question. </p>
<p>If you have caught my drift from the last 2 paragraphs, I never mentioned Bynum in there. If anyone here does not like a 20-10 legit center with 2 bpg please raise your hand and I&#8217;ll have Gilbert Arenas shoot you with a machine gun.</p>
<p>The point is not about liking Bynum or not. I can guarantee you, 28 other teams would have Bynum start for their teams RIGHT NOW. I say that with a great deal of respect to the league&#8217;s only legitimate center in Yao Ming because he is injured, and the league&#8217;s best center in Dwight Howard.</p>
<p>Andrew Bynum on a good day gives you 20-10. On his worst days he gives you solid contributions via his blocking and rebounding. If he is unleashed, without conflict or having to worry about someone else in the post getting touches, he COULD be 25-12-3 easily. After all, he was 22-11-2 for us playing beside Kobe (and without Pau).</p>
<p>The problem about your post is that you are referring to the stereotype of &#8220;we don&#8217;t need Kobe and Bynum to win&#8221; which in fact is not the case of this post. If anything, Darius came up with this post because of 2 things:</p>
<p>a. The Lakers won beautifully last night without the top 2 characters&#8230;</p>
<p>b. The Lakers are shelling out effort whenever 2 of the best players are absent.</p>
<p>So try to look through the post as more than just we don&#8217;t need Kobe&#8230; although you could really make a case that more than half of the fanbase is clamoring we don&#8217;t need Bynum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

