At one point during last night’s Laker loss, color commentator Stu Lantz said he didn’t want to see the Lakers playing zone for too long because it sends a message to the team you don’t trust their man-to-man defense. I thought that sounded like a pretty good message to send, especially watching how the Lakers defend the pick-and-roll.
For the last couple Laker games, I have been watching and tracking how the Lakers are dealing with the screen and roll this season — and last night the Hornets won in part by exploiting how the Lakers defend it (or in this case didn’t).
First, the ever so brief refresher: There are really four ways a team can defend a pick-and-roll, and I’ll just steal the descriptions from an amazing article Kevin Pelton did last year for 82games.com:
Switch it – The players defending the ball handler and the picker switch, usually creating a mismatch.
Trap – Both defenders go towards the ball handler and aggressively trap him while the other three defenders zone against the four remaining offensive players.
“Show” or “Hedge” – The player defending the picker briefly steps out into the ball handler’s path, slowing him up enough that the player defending the ball handler has time to recover. Then the player defending the picker recovers to his original man. It’s worth noting that this is how the Spurs usually defend the pick-and-roll.
Go under the pick – Done only against weak shooters, the player defending the picker steps back to allow the player defending the ball handler to go between him and the screen and get to his man. This leaves an open jumpshot for the ball handler.
Occasionally a player can fight through the top of a pick, however if the offensive pair sets a good pick and runs off it well, that doesn’t work.
Last season the Lakers were all about the “show,†it’s what they did 46% of the time and it was quite successful, also last season the Lakers varied how they approached the pick-and-roll more than this season.
Right now the Lakers switch, and do it 65% of the time. My guess is that the Laker coaching staff sees its long and versatile lineup and thinks the team should be able to switch and still be effective much of the time. My observation from the last few games is that how successful teams are in exploiting the resulting mismatch fron the switch goes a long way to how effective their offense is against the Lakers. As I noted the other day, the Pacers at one point in the third quarter ran a pick and ended up with Jordan Farmar covering Jermaine O’Neal in the post, and the Pacers never got the ball inside, instead settling for a jumper.
The Hornets, on the other hand, made great use of the pick to free up the insanely quick Chris Paul. In the first half they put the “high†in “high pick-and-roll,†often running Paul off a pick just a few steps inside the half court line (as opposed to near the three point line, where most teams run it).
Now, Kwame Brown, seeing his man 35 feet from the basket, sagged way off, so Paul would run around the pick and then just take off toward the basket. The defender often tried to go under the pick but it was fairly useless, Paul was too quick and at best the defender was running along side Paul into the lane. Kwame then had to try to pick up the speeding Paul, other Laker “help the helper†rotations were slow and the shorthanded Hornets were living in the paint. (To be fair, the Lakers tried other things as well on Paul and all were unsuccessful.)
One thing the Lakers are doing some this year that they didn’t much before is try to trap the ball handler, taking advantage of the Lakers’ length. They don’t do it much, just a handful of times a game trying to catch a guard unaware. The results have been spotty — it led to some turnovers and easy buckets, but also a couple times (including once against the Hornets) the point guard made the correct pass and it was an easy basket.
Another thing of note, Jordan Farmar tries harder and has more success fighting over the top of the pick than any other Laker, something he does 16% of the time I tracked it. When he does it’s very effective, often leading to a reset (and usually another pick).
The Laker coaching staff is varying how the team defends the screen and roll depending upon the team and situation to a degree, but I think they like the Lakers versatility and think they should be able to switch and still have a reasonable matchup. My sample size for this post is very small (from the last several games), but it is something that needs to be watched as the season goes on, and maybe the strategy adjusted if it isn’t working.
Bryan says
Next up: Atlanta. They’re on game 3 of a 4 game road trip, and will have a day of rest coming into the game. They upset Denver in a biblical 4th quarter collapse on Wednesday. The Lakers have to win this one, playing at home (as they have been forever now) and with a day of rest, coming off an upset loss. Oh, and San Antonio is next. Momentum would be nice.
San Antonio, better than everyone but the Bobcats, comes in on Sunday after a day of rest, it will be the first game of a short road trip. And they’re the benchmark.
Don Ford says
That’s a very, um penetrating, analysis — the sort that makes guys like me read sites like yours. Thanks.
Goo says
:reads analysis:
:head explodes:
:still somehow plays better d than smush:
Craig W. says
I sure hope some of the Laker brass read this blog. Your post was great and I know from experience that those in the middle of the situation often can’t see the forest for the trees. Besides I also believe Phil is hard headed, as well as very smart.
I suspect the bigs do less switching because they don’t have confidence that the guards following their man into the middle won’t rotate over and try to screen out the bigs that will come open. This is where I think Smush does the most harm – at least he should step in and try to screen someone off if he is beside/behind his man.
Muddywood says
Switching on the Pick&Roll works best when you have those interchangable perimeter players that are truly of a defensive mindset. The Bulls were. MJ, Pippen, Harper could all switch. To an extent, the Showtime Lakers could switch also(Magic, Byron,Coop). But, they have to be committed to defense. Smush, from what I have observed, is not. He just plays enough D to get by. He uses his hands trying to get steals instead of playing smart position defense. If any defender sets a pick and just brushes him, Smush is out of the play. Smush does’nt even try to fight through the pick.
SMush should be coming off the bench as a scoring option and Farmar should be starting. Let Farmar take his lumps. Tony Parker did it and survived.
Goo says
Even though Farmar is better I think he’s a great asset with the 2nd line, he creates shots for guys like Vlad/Bynum/Evans that
A: Smush probably wouldn’t create
B: Aren’t necessary with guys like Kobe and Odom handling the ball with the starters
Now if we could somehow clone Jordan or procure an energy drink that guarantees 48 straight minutes of physical labor, that would work also
DrRayEye says
Kurt,
You talk about “tracking the Lakers” on the pick and roll, thinking of the Hornets game in particular. Let’s be more specific. We’re not talking about Luke, Lamar, Kwame, or Kobe . It’s the point guard.
Shammond didn’t play. Sasha hardly played. We’re down to Jordan Farmar and . . . .oh, did I forget the Smusher?
For those that somehow were oblivious to the problem, Chris Paul exposed and abused the Smusher, while Farmar battled more evenly against Jannero Pargo.
Despite the fans who are more and more lining up against Smush (much like Payton some years ago), the problem is team–and it goes far beyond the Pick and Roll. Done right, team defense almost looks like a ballet. Such a team ballet would have stymied and frustrated Chris Paul and his pick up squad as his options were reduced.
Farmar almost won a national championship riding the five car defense train. Alone, he looks a little forlorn. A committed team of athletes (fallable on their own)playing defense together as a unit are beautiful to watch. I’m sure that Jordon could get his teammates tickets to a UCLA game if they would like to see what it looks like.
Kurt says
Agreed. Especially in the case of Paul, we can’t expect any point guard to do the job solo, and the Laker ballet in that game looked like an elementary school production.
Muddywood says
I dont know. Maybe it’s just what I perceive to be Smush’s lack of defensive intensity. Maybe that’s just his demeanor. Maybe he just doesn’t “look” intense like Sam Perkins didn’t look intense. I don’t know what it is but I know I don’t like it in my point guard.