• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Roster
  • Schedule
  • Forum Blue?
  • About Forum Blue & Gold
    • About FB&G
    • Forum Blue?
    • New Hoops Stats 101
    • Commenting Guidelines
    • Privacy Policy
  • Support FB&G

Forum Blue And Gold

A Lakers Blog. Thoughts, reflections, and the odd rant on the Los Angeles Lakers and the NBA (even the Clippers).

  • Lakers News
  • Lakers Analysis
  • Laker Film Room
  • Cranjis’ Corner
  • Lakers Data
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Thinking About Luke’s Offensive Philosophy

November 17, 2016 by Reed


We know from everything Luke has said, taught, and done that one of his core coaching philosophies is the need for an unselfish team approach to offense. He speaks more of ball movement than perhaps anything else, and recently emphasized the importance of achieving 300 passes per game as a team. This philosophy is unsurprising given Luke’s style as a player, and given his training under both Steve Kerr and Phil Jackson, who both tried to implement team offensive systems over one on one play. Just today, Luke commented that he learned from Phil that “One bad pass to start a possession can start a chain.”

The Lakers have made substantial strides so far this year on offense, and currently sit 9th in the league in offensive rating at 109.6, which is a stunning increase from where they finished last year (101.6 and 29th). This has made me think about Luke’s offensive philosophy and how his approach compares to some of the great offenses of the past few years.

There are many ways to build a successful offense in the NBA, which is a testament to the complexity and art of the game. During the last 5 years, 22 teams have reached an offensive rating of 110 or greater, with last year’s Warriors unsurprisingly finishing the highest at 114.5. (The best offense of all time was the 1987 Lakers at 115.6, followed closely by the 1992 Bulls, 1988 Celtics and 2010 Suns.) What is striking when studying the great offenses from the modern history of the league is that they have taken radically different approaches to the same end result. To illustrate this, below is a table showing key offensive stats for the 22 teams that had an offensive rating 110 or higher during the last five years:

Season Tm 3P ORB TRB AST TOV Pace ORtg eFG%
2015-16 GSW 1077 816 3788 2373 1245 99.3 114.5 0.563
2015-16 OKC 678 1071 3987 1883 1305 96.7 113.1 0.524
2012-13 OKC 598 854 3579 1753 1253 93.3 112.4 0.527
2014-15 LAC 827 784 3495 2031 1012 94.7 112.4 0.533
2012-13 MIA 717 676 3166 1890 1143 90.7 112.3 0.552
2013-14 LAC 693 858 3526 2016 1136 95.9 112.1 0.526
2014-15 GSW 883 853 3667 2248 1185 98.3 111.6 0.54
2013-14 POR 770 1022 3808 1904 1125 94.9 111.5 0.504
2013-14 DAL 721 840 3354 1935 1110 93.5 111.2 0.526
2012-13 NYK 891 890 3326 1579 988 89.8 111.1 0.515
2014-15 CLE 826 911 3523 1814 1171 92.3 111.1 0.52
2013-14 HOU 779 920 3717 1755 1323 96.3 111 0.531
2014-15 TOR 726 881 3407 1701 1057 92.8 111 0.508
2015-16 CLE 880 873 3650 1861 1114 93.3 110.9 0.524
2013-14 MIA 665 627 3024 1847 1212 91.2 110.9 0.554
2011-12 SAS 552 683 2836 1528 895 92.9 110.9 0.528
2012-13 LAC 627 938 3413 1958 1197 91.1 110.6 0.526
2013-14 OKC 664 887 3668 1794 1256 95.4 110.5 0.52
2013-14 SAS 698 762 3548 2064 1180 95 110.5 0.537
2012-13 DEN 521 1092 3693 2002 1253 95.1 110.4 0.515
2015-16 SAS 570 770 3601 2010 1071 93.8 110.3 0.526
2015-16 TOR 708 836 3560 1536 1073 92.9 110 0.504

The variance in approach is fascinating. For example, the 2016 Warriors made nearly 500 more 3s than several teams. The 2013 Miami team (which had the best Lebron-Wade-Bosh era offense) played at a snail’s pace of 90.7, while the Warriors played ultra fast. The 2014 Blazers had a dominant offense despite having only a 50.4 eFG%, due to being so dominant on the offensive glass (creating extra possessions). The 2012 Spurs did not make many 3s or grab offensive boards, but kept their turnovers to a historically low clip. The 2013 Knicks, which we probably don’t immediately think of as a great offense, leveraged a high 3 point rate with low turnovers and a crawl pace to dominate on offense. And on and on we could go.

The point is, there is no one way to skin this cat, but you have to figure out how to do some things incredibly well. And I’m sure that coaches craft their approaches based on the strengths and weaknesses of the players they have to work with. Luke acknowledged today that he has admired this trait in Popovich, commenting:

Luke Walton really admires how Gregg Popovich has adapted his system to cater personnel. Walton wants his system to be flexible to roster

— Mark Medina (@MarkG_Medina) November 17, 2016

It appears that Luke is running a system that is going to favor a fast pace (Lakers are 4th at 102.8), 3 point shots (11th), ball movement (the 300 pass goal), even if at the expense of turnovers. The attack is largely “outside-in” without seeking traditional post-ups. Instead, we seek Russell, Lou, Clarkson, and Randle attacking on the move from the perimeter, leading to breaks in the defense that create open threes for spot up shooters or passes to the rim for Mozgov/Nance/Black. This is an exciting brand of offense.

When run correctly, we see real pace in the half court sets, with one action flowing into another until the ball finds an open player, or a player with an exploitable matchup. Think Russell drawing a trap near midcourt, hitting Randle at the short roll, who then draws the defense and lobs to Mozgov cutting to the rim from the baseline. Or Lou penetrating off a horns set, sucking the defense in so that Ingram gets an open corner three.

Another of Luke’s offensive core principles has caught my eye this year watching this Laker team – specifically, the egalitarian nature of the offense, with no one or two players having to drive the offense through heavy minutes/usage. Instead, Luke has encouraged and successfully cultivated a true team-focused approach, in which the ball seems to find whoever has the best matchup any given possession/night, resulting in a different “star” each night. There are obvious pros and cons to this approach – i.e., not having a star diversifies the offense, so that you are not dependent on one player shooting well; but having a star also means you can rely on someone to bend and break a defense each game, even if the system isn’t working well.

Taking the 2016 Thunder and 2014 Spurs as case studies highlight the fundamental difference in approach, with the Thunder ranking 2nd on the above list based on an extreme version of “star-offense,” and the 2014 Spurs winning the title with perhaps the best example of “team-offense.” The charts below shows how different the teams were in methodology, even if the end result was the same:

Season Tm 3P ORB TRB AST TOV Pace ORtg eFG%
2015-16 OKC 678 1071 3987 1883 1305 96.7 113.1 0.524
2013-14 SAS 698 762 3548 2064 1180 95 110.5 0.537

 

Category 2014 Spurs 2016 Thunder
Off Eff 110.5 113.1
Minutes/g Parker – 29.4

Duncan – 29.2

Leonard – 29.1

Durant – 35.8

Westbrook – 34.4

Ibaka – 32.1

Usage Parker – 26.5

Duncan – 25.2

Ginobil – 24.7

Westbrook – 31.6

Durant – 30.6

Kanter – 23.4

Points/g Parker – 16.7

Duncan – 15.1

 

Durant – 28.2

Westbrook – 23.5

 

AST/g Parker – 5.7

Team – 23.0

Westbrook – 10.4

Team – 25.2

Passes/g 334 (2nd in league) 264 (last)

As you can see, there are marked differences between the teams. No one on the Spurs played 30 minutes, scored over 17 points, had more than 6 assists, or had a usage over 26.5%. The Thunder, on the other hand, were driven by Westbrook and Durant, with the two stars logging heavy minutes, finishing over 30% usage, scoring over 51 points per game between them, and Westbrook averaging over 10 assists. Further, the Spurs were second in the league at 334 passes per game, sharing the ball in a team-focused offense, while the Thunder finished last in the league in passes, with Durant and Westbrook essentially taking turns in an isolation heavy system.

It seems clear to me that Luke wants to build an offense that is more Spurs than Thunder. This year, for example, no player averages 30 minutes, but 9 average over 20. No player averages 17 points, but 5 average between 13 and 17. No player averages 5 assists, but 3 average more than 3.5. Through the team’s first 12 games, no one has led the team in scoring more than 3 times: Lou (3x), Clarkson (3x), Russell (3x), Randle (2x), and Young (1x).

Russell’s 32 point outing last game was the first 30 point game of the season, and 3 times the highest scoring player hasn’t even reached 20 points. Typically, we see around 5 players in double figures, with different players dominating different portions of the game, and the team riding whoever has the hot hand. The last game against Brooklyn exemplified this with Russell getting hot in the first quarter, making 5 threes, Mozgov and Deng carrying them in the 3rd, and Randle carrying the load to finish the game. This kind of offensive diversity can have great benefits, as it minimizes the need for one or two players to dominate every night, and allows for flexibility to work the ball to literally anyone who is in a position to score based on their matchup.

And, of course, this is drastically different than the Kobe era. Even in his final season, Kobe finished with a 32.2 USG%, and the team led the league in isolation frequency. Kobe is my favorite player of all time, but I must admit it is refreshing to see a different kind of offense, with more ball movement, more variance, and less predictability.

Luke’s diversified approach this year makes sense for a young team with developing players and no established all star. I suspect that a hierarchy will naturally develop as the young core grows, with Russell in particular potentially emerging as a consistent high usage star that can really drive the offense. Based on his production to date, it seems likely he will eventually settle in as a 30% usage point guard with high scoring efficiency. He’s already at 28% for this year, although his minutes are low and he has not found game to game consistency. Randle and Ingram also have shown flashes that they will be able to carry a heavier load in time, and Clarkson is certainly showing the ability to score in waves, particularly in his new 6th man role.

I am hopeful that even as the young core grows, and the team correspondingly evolves, Luke will be remain committed to this unselfish, team-focused approach to offense. There is something beautiful in watching a team whip the ball from one side of the court to another, ultimately to find a player positioned to take a high percentage shot; where the art of the game intersects with the science of what works. Luke was a perfect example of this style of play as a player, and has transformed the offensive culture of the team more quickly than any of us could have hoped. I’m excited to watch him adapt to the developing talent on this team and harness them into an offensive machine.

–Reed (follow me @reed_nba)


Previous Post
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. KevTheBold says

    November 17, 2016 at 9:33 pm

    Thanks Reed, what an informative and fascinating read.
    You put a dizzying array of concepts into a neat, easy to understand package.
    Now I can watch the games with much more insight into the inner workings of the engine.

  2. Renato Afonso says

    November 18, 2016 at 6:08 am

    Really good post. It shows that there are more ways to win than just increasing pace and shooting more threes. This is what works for this roster and, hopefully, Walton will keep improving it.

    2011-12 SAS are also an interesting outlier with low rebounds and low turnover rate while boasting a high efficiency.

    And Reed, I know this takes a lot of work, but could you complete the above tables with recent past dynasties or recent memorable teams while showing the average numbers for the league. The Sacramento teams from 1999-2002, our three peat team, our Gasol-Kobe team could also show interesting data when compared to the league average in those years.

  3. DieTryin says

    November 18, 2016 at 6:34 am

    This was an eye opening post Reed! Well written and researched. Truly demonstrates the point that there are indeed many roads to the top of the mountain!

  4. Fulofunk says

    November 18, 2016 at 7:05 am

    Good post, thank you!
    I would love to see our team model it’s journey after the Spurs who are, IMHO, the classiest org in the NBA. Even though Pop seems like an a%%h$#e with anyone NOT Craig Seager or Spurs employee, his players play hard, get back on D no matter HOW big the previous play was, and display very little showboating. They have stars, but they play as a team. Luke is fostering the same thing in our guys AND he is great in post game too! It feels realllly good to be a Laker fan right now.

  5. david__h says

    November 18, 2016 at 7:11 am

    reed:  very nice read. and use of the term :
    e·gal·i·tar·i·ani??al??ter??n/adjectiveadjective: egalitarian1. of, relating to, or believing in the principle that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities.”a fairer, more egalitarian society”nounnoun: egalitarian; plural noun: egalitarians1. a person who advocates or supports egalitarian principle
    Not a day goes by that someone shows their
    appreciation for coach luke walton.You hit
    a home run with your slam dunk post.
    Go lakers

  6. Reed_nba says

    November 18, 2016 at 1:19 pm

    Renato Afonso I’d be interested in doing that comparison/analysis sometime Renato. Good idea.

Primary Sidebar

laker-film-room-podcast
Tweets by @forumbluegold

Archives

Categories

Donate to FB&G

Footer

© 2023 Forum Blue & Gold · Partner with USA Today Sports Digital Properties · WordPress Support by WP Site Care